Home > Regions > Middle East and North Africa > Israel-Palestine > Israel, America and the New Middle East

Author

Henry Siegman

, director of the US/Middle East Project in New York , is a visiting research professor at the Sir Joseph Hotung Middle East Program, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. He is a former national director of the American Jewish Congress and of the Synagogue Council of Ame...
More

Related publications

Israel, America and the New Middle East

Henry Siegman , 14 February 2011

Summary

Virtually overnight, the Arab Middle East has been unrecognizably transformed. The implications of that transformation for America’s vital interests in that region and for Israel-Palestine peacemaking will be far-reaching. The peace process so far has been a meaningless exercise as successive US administrations chose to ignore the reality that Israel’s  long-planned goal of establishing irreversible control through its settlements over Palestine was clearly in sight, if not already an accomplished fact.

Given the vast imbalances between the two parties, and the commitment of successive Israeli governments to expanding the settlement enterprise, there was never the slightest chance of a two-state solution without forceful US intervention. That intervention never came, as the US, deferring to domestic political pressures, pretended it believed Israel’s declared commitment to a two-state accord.

Israel’s leaders believed that Arab authoritarian regimes, whose survival depended to a considerable extent on the US security umbrella, would keep in check popular Arab outrage over the failure to halt Palestinian dispossession. The fall of Mubarak and the tremors it has caused in neighbouring Arab regimes will henceforth prevent them from exercising that restraining role, or from collaborating with the US and Israel in an anti-Iran coalition, thus undermining Israel’s strategic situation.

Rescuing a sovereign Palestinian state offers the US a chance to restore the credibility and influence it has been losing in the region and to weaken Iran’s. Given the tectonic changes in this area and the threat they pose both to American and Israeli interests, a US intervention to end the Israel-Palestine conflict is not only politically conceivable but, perhaps for the first time, achievable.

Featured

Stay informed

Subscribe to notifications from NOREF.

Follow NOREF

Recommended

 
International Crisis Group: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Palestinians and the End of the Peace Process
International Crisis Group: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Palestinians and the End of the Peace Process
 
BBC
BBC
Syria opposition head 'to resign'
Syria opposition head 'to resign'
US strike plan on Iran 'ready'
US strike plan on Iran 'ready'
Turkey jets 'pursue Israel plane'
Turkey jets 'pursue Israel plane'
 
Open Democracy - Open Security
Open Democracy - Open Security
Defining NATO partnerships: why the 'Stability' critique is flawed, Josiah Surface
Defining NATO partnerships: why the 'Stability' critique is flawed, Josiah Surface
The Chicago Summit: a relevant NATO in a post-western world ?, Trine Flockhart
The Chicago Summit: a relevant NATO in a post-western world ?, Trine Flockhart
A UN emergency peace service?, H. Peter Langille
A UN emergency peace service?, H. Peter Langille
 
ISN
ISN
Pakistan's Relations with India: Beyond Kashmir?
Pakistan's Relations with India: Beyond Kashmir?
Wie weit kann die Krise mit dem Iran führen?
Wie weit kann die Krise mit dem Iran führen?
Iraq After the US Withdrawal: Staring into the Abyss
Iraq After the US Withdrawal: Staring into the Abyss