NOREF - Advancing the UN’s women, peace and security agenda: political challenges and opportunities

Home > Themes > Women, peace and security > Advancing the UN’s women, peace and security agenda: political challenges and opportunities

Author

Rob Jenkins

Rob Jenkins is a professor of political science at Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York. He has consulted for the World Bank, the UK Department for International Development, and the Economist Intelligence Unit, and received research grants from the Ford Foundation,...
More

Related publications

National implementation of the UN Security Council’s women, peace and security resolutions: Aisling Swaine , 14 March 2013
Women, peace and security in post-conflict and peacebuilding contexts: Jacqui True , 14 March 2013
Sexual violence in conflict and post-conflict settings: Inger Skjelsbaek , 14 March 2013
Moving beyond the numbers: integrating women into peacekeeping operations: Olivera Simić , 13 March 2013
Women and peace processes, negotiations, and agreements: operational opportunities and challenges: Christine Bell , 13 March 2013
UNSCR 1325: the challenges of framing women’s rights as a security matter: Natalie Florea Hudson , 12 March 2013
Women, peace and security: new conceptual challenges and opportunities: Sophie Richter-Devroe , Nicola Pratt , 12 March 2013

Workshop on UN resolution 1325 in Malha, North Darfur by UNAMID under CC license on Flickr

Download full text

Advancing the UN’s women, peace and security agenda: political challenges and opportunities

Rob Jenkins, 8 March 2013

The UN’s primary roadmap for operationalising its women, peace and security (WPS) agenda is the 2010 Seven-Point Action Plan on Gender-Responsive Peacebuilding, which specifies concrete commitments for the UN system in such areas as conflict resolution and economic recovery, and focuses on institutional reforms in relevant UN entities. Despite the Action Plan’s endorsement by the Secretary-General and his senior leadership team, implementation has been extremely disappointing. The UN’s failure to fulfil its commitments stems from weak incentives and insufficient transparency. The two entities charged with co-ordinating implementation – the Peacebuilding Support Office and UN Women – lack the institutional leverage to change behaviour in key operational entities such as the Departments of Peacekeeping Operations and Political Affairs and the UN Development Programme.

Member states such as Norway can help to improve implementation by (1) partnering with non-permanent Security Council members committed to advancing the WPS agenda; (2) using membership on UN specialised agencies’ executive boards (and in World Bank executive directorates) to obtain and publicise information on fulfilling Action Plan commitments; (3) mobilising embassy staff to support implementation in “pilot” countries identified by the UN; and (4) earmarking contributions to country-specific multidonor trust funds for projects focused on enhancing women’s capacities to participate in peacebuilding.